The US Web site has been suspended. But for the amount of work it seems to do (15 tonnes per hour), a bucket crusher might be a better answer; check out this Web site:

Eco-Crusher

It's a jaw crusher that mounts on an excavator as an attachment. Its tons per hour rates are from 15 to 90, depending on the model.

Thats pretty awesome. Thanks for sharing that.

You have to be careful in using a jaw crusher as your primary and finishing crusher. Jaw crushers make a very slender, elongated product. This is fine for some farmer or some company who has a very, very loose spec.

Typically, jaw crushers are used as primaries that feed a secondary crusher which does the final shaping and sizing.

The best "bang for your buck" crusher would a horizontal shaft impact crusher. It has a high reduction ratio, excellent particle shape, and you can recirculate oversize off a screen and send it back to the crusher. The big disadvantage to a HSI is the operating costs ($.10 to $.25 per ton) and maintenance. Even a small 40"x34" HSI can reduce 20" concrete to -3" (90% under -1") at a rate of 75-100TPH.

Of course, if money was no object, you would run jaw crusher to screen to cone and back to the screen.

Yeah, this bucket crusher isn't meant so much for high production or to make spec product; it's meant more for reducing material on smaller jobsites ... to increase hauling capacity, use as onsite fill -- or sell, if you don't need spec product. Its production rates aren't huge. But if you don't want to bring in a separate portable crusher (or crushers), it does work well -- because it's an attachment.