Welcome to Demolition Forum, the only Online Source for Demolition News and Discussion.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to reading the latest in Industry News, Read and learn from the experts, Upload your own demolition photos to your photo album, read and learn from the experts, and many other special features.
Office & BusinessIt’s all business here! License requirements, permits, hiring policies, employee problems, marketing and advertising, business development, computer hardware and software, websites, and more.
Do you think Minority Participation requirements are working?
Just wanted to get to know folks on this forum. I'am currently working for a demolition company in St. Louis, MO. and have been involved with the demolition industry practically my whole life. I'd like to get your opinions on what technology or Environmental issue will be next to effect the demolition industry? I would also like to know what trends are being seen in the bid rooms around the country. Hope everyone is making a buck and if you make two, I hope you give me the oppurtunity to make one from you.
I believe there are pros and cons relevant to Minority Participation! I have seen minorities charge higher rates for their portion of work knowing they HAVE to be used in certain Federal and State funded projects. I believe certain opportunities should be afforded to Minorities.
I believe select projects should be set-aside for competitive bidding, as some are.
It may best serve meeting Minority goals by negotiating fixed rates prior to letting a project for bid. Make those rates part of the bid package to negate monopolistic bidding tactics.
This could simplify the search and pray portion of many projects!
Up here in Washington State, since to pass of I-200 a few years ago, most state funded projects require only "voluntary" requirements.
I remember biding on a large saw-cutting project, almost 10 miles of cutting, it was a federally funded project and the requirements were in place. A firm that had very little experience in saw-cutting were almost double of all 3 bids received and they made it known that it was because they were a minority owned and they were planning on getting the job at that price. There was very little work for other trades and the saw-cutting was more than half of the work to be done and was most of the contracted price, so they figured they could manipulate the system.