Demolitionforum.com Forums  

Register Now! Demolition Tool Store - Demolition Gallery - Classifieds - Advertising Info - Forum Guidelines

Welcome to Demolition Forum, the only Online Source for Demolition News and Discussion.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to reading the latest in Industry News, Read and learn from the experts, Upload your own demolition photos to your photo album, read and learn from the experts, and many other special features.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.


Go Back   Demolitionforum.com Forums > DEMOLITION TOPICS > Means & Methods

Means & Methods Have a question or comment on select or full building demolition? Learn about bidding a job, finding the best tool or piece of equipment, or the best way to demo a job.


Why not Register? or Log in to remove these ads
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2006, 03:13 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: IDAHO
Posts: 91
Default High Reach vs. economics

I have seen many high reach excavators. For the life of me I can't see the cost justification versus the dependabilty and usage. I saw 1 that crashed like a computer, 1 that had a rotating shear that was being fixed more than used and 1 that took an Einstien to get the proper angle because the rotation would free swing.
I've wrecked 2-8 story buildings with a 400 Komatsu and a bucket, both in Hospital environs. I demo'd a 9-story hotel the same way. Are we losing touch with true demolition techniques? Does this loss justify the high $$$$ for high reach vs. crane?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Why not Register? or Log in to remove these ads
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2006, 03:20 PM
demobud's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 679
Default

Just to play devils advocate I suppose you could say that the technology creates a new skillset that must be learned. That being said, I see where you are coming from; I guess it has a lot to do with a company's bottom line. I know I can't afford one so I tend to stick to what I can reach, so to speak. I have used high reach equipmenet in the past and am ambivalent. I have seen them used correctly and seen them used where they were absolutely unecessary.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006, 08:06 AM
James's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kent, WA.
Posts: 4,206
Send a message via AIM to James Send a message via MSN to James
Default

That is a great question. I don’t know if we have lost touch in a sense. It is just the way things and technology is going. With buildings getting built closer and closer together, the industry has to come up with new ways to combat these things.

I think some of it is that XYZ Company has one so now for me to compete I need one also. I have only seen a couple of projects that used them and they were effective, but I think that was mainly the operator. Like demobud I have seen them used on a couple of projects and thought what the heck are they doing.
__________________
Still just visiting? Come say Hello!
We have some open advertising spots available
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006, 09:50 AM
demobud's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 679
Default

I have to say I'm really impressed with how some of the European companies are adapting miniexes for taller building demo; using them to bring tight structures down from the inside out, one floor at a time (kinda like we used to in the old days with sledges and wheel barrows).
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2006, 09:29 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: IDAHO
Posts: 91
Default

My Greek partner, Nikos, has truly impressed me with the execution of multi-stories demolition with minis. He came over and assisted me with a seperation on an 8-story hospital in Memphis. I was nicely educated on simplicity and economics.
I watched him do a 5-story in Thessaloniki, Greece at a rate of a floor every 2 days until it was excavator height. Saved alot with just the minis...fuel, space, efficiency and time.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-21-2006, 06:54 AM
James's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kent, WA.
Posts: 4,206
Send a message via AIM to James Send a message via MSN to James
Default

They do seem to be efficient when the due the work that way.
__________________
Still just visiting? Come say Hello!
We have some open advertising spots available
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2007, 05:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 344
Default

High reach not always necessary. I watched an amazing job go down with a CAT 365 downtown today. The operator built a huge ramp with debris from the neighboring building that he had just demo'ed and cleverly used that to climb up to reach up to the fifth story of the building he was tearing down. The 365 did the job perfectly, with no high reach or extended boom necessary. Just awesome to watch the power in that 365 machine too.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007, 10:58 AM
wawrecker's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northwest
Posts: 52
Default

Although our machine is not a true "highreach" it did cost me $55k to put together on our base machine giving us 45' of working reach with a 200. We just used it to remove 22,000 sf of exterior stucco off of plywood in about 24 hours. The formula looks like this. $$+$$$=$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. And if you calculate in the fact we haul this machine behind our hooklift requiring only a $28.00 permit you can throw a few more of these in the bank $$$$$$$$.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-29-2007, 08:02 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: IDAHO
Posts: 91
Default

I would have to assume that if you can justify the cost over a long term basis, kudos to you. It appeared to faciltate a particular need immediately. I just hope it doesn't get rusty in the yard.
Mazzochi/LVI seem to keep their high reaches busy.
I can still floor by floor quicker and trip more square feet in a day than any high reach. Red Mandell can prove the same doing floor by floor too! He's the best at it.
When you can demo about 32,000 sq.ft. a day of an eight story (heavy r/c)with your high reach call me. I'd enjoy doing the time study for you!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2007, 11:19 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9
Default

Just my view of the situation. It appears if you have the financial wherewithall and the knowledge/experience then you can justify a longreach. If you don't, then you tend to denigrate the advantages of such a machine. If you wish to bring down an eight story building floor by floor, I wish you the best. We just brought down an eight story building, tight quarters etc. in 2 ten hour days. Salvage/Debris was loaded out by a minimal crew in 4 days. I didn't have to wear myself out building ramps, exposures were easily protected and 32,000 square feet a day was left in the rubble pile. In any event, I used to work for a fellow who used a shovel when a backhoe was nearby, a peavey when a crane was nearby and wrecked and loaded with a crane and clam bucket when an excavator was nearby. How times change!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Why not Register? or Log in to remove these ads
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


Forum Sponsors



Partners
Dexpan Silent Demo
Diamond Tools SuperCenter
High Reach Demo
Scrap Metal Prices
EnviroBidNet
Heavy Equipment Forums
Lawn Cafe
Phillyblast
Excavator Trader
Home Theater Forum

Advertising Partner


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2005-2008 DemolitionForum - All Rights Reserved