Welcome to Demolition Forum, the only Online Source for Demolition News and Discussion.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to reading the latest in the Demolition Industry News, Read and Learn from the Experts, Find Upcoming Projects, Upload your demolition photos to your own photo album, and many other special features.
You will also have the access to subscribe to Herb Duane’s Inside the Industry Newsletter. This bi-weekly newsletter is full of Demolition News from an Industry Insider, as well as Bid Results, Projects Leads, and so much more. You can read more about Herb’s Newsletter here, subscription rates are $24.95 a month.
Industry NewsUpdated Every Weekday! Read and share the latest in demolition news from around the world. Where you can read industry press releases or add your own.
A couple was surprised when they lost their home to an emergency demolition following the Oct. 12-13 snowstorm.
They were even more surprised when they got a bill for about $40,000 from the city.
"It's overwhelming," said Isabelle Carrington, "It's a tragedy. It's like you have nothing. You're homeless, and then you get hit with this enormous bill, and its like, "Where does life begin again?' "
The saga began the night of Oct. 13, when Carrington; her husband, James; and their 4-year-old son left their home because the electricity went out.
Late that night, the storm triggered an electrical fire.
A fire marshal at the scene declared the home structurally unsafe to enter, said Richard M. Tobe, commissioner of the Department of Economic Development, Permits & Inspections. Tobe's office then bid out the emergency demolition the day after the fire and got two responses - one for about $35,000, another for around $60,000.
City officials said they will do what they can to help the family, but they stand by the decision to raze the four-bedroom home in the city's University District.
"It was not safe to enter the structure," said Tobe, adding he was at the site three times. He said that with communications in such "bad shape" during the citywide state of emergency, he did not know where the family was or how to reach them. Still, he said, the city is required to seek reimbursement for the demolition.
"The roof was completely gone and the second floor completely caved in, we believe. It was a serious fire," he said. "In hindsight, we should try harder to find people than we were able to do during the storm. I believe what we did in the crisis of the storm was correct. If we had more time, we might have acted a little differently, but during the state of emergency, we didn't have phone numbers or names."
Carrington said she and her family - who are now living with a relative in the city - were unable to get to the house immediately after the fire because of downed trees and power lines. She and her husband arrived a few hours after the blaze was contained and were at the scene the day after. The damage was bad, she remembered, but she never imagined the house needed demolishing.
"I mean, upstairs the two bedrooms were gone, and there was damage to the back room. There was water damage, but any house that has a fire will have water damage," she said. "Within 48 hours, a neighbor called and said our house was being torn down. Days later, we get this other bill from the city for $40,000. It's just unbelievable."
Carrington, an employee with Bank of America since 1989, said she and her husband, who works for the Thruway Authority, are waiting to hear from city officials about what kind of assistance is available.
University Council Member Bonnie E. Russell, a neighbor, and Rep. Louise M. Slaughter's office are looking into the case.
Russell is setting up a meeting this week between the family and Timothy Wanamaker, director of strategic planning.
Wanamaker has indicated there are housing programs available and the family may qualify for a new home, Russell said.
"We will do as much as we can to help this family," said John Santori, a Slaughter spokesman. "It's pretty shocking what happened. We've been in touch with the family and made calls to FEMA and to anybody else who might be able to help."
Tobe's office also has reached out to FEMA on behalf of the family because "they had a loss greater than their insurance."
Meanwhile, the Carringtons are still reeling from the experience. "This was our first home. We had it for nine years," Isabelle Carrington said. "That's the only home our son knows."
__________________ Read Here! A New & Improved Demolition Forum Coming Soon!
$40k Wow! thats what i was thinking. Someone was taking advantage of the city during a storm , I think.
On another note , thats bullsheet that the town can raze your house without contacting you. I bet they lost all kinds of stuff that they would have saved. doug
I was thinking the same thing. How can someone just come in and tear down your house without notifying you? Not only that, why didn't they allow the homeowner to get the work done himself or have him hire someone? Why did it have to become and emergancy demolition? It's not like it's a public place and it wasn't endagering other structures.......Something just is right.
I could only imagine what this will do to the town reputation and the backlash from this.
__________________ Read Here! A New & Improved Demolition Forum Coming Soon!
It amazes me that they moved on it so fast. The engineering department here is 12 months out enforcing condemnation orders.
And, forty grand to do a house?! Man I wish I coud get that for every house I do! I'd do nothing but houses.