Demolitionforum.com Forums  

Register Now! Demolition Tool Store - Demolition Gallery - Classifieds - Advertising Info - Forum Guidelines

Welcome to Demolition Forum, the only Online Source for Demolition News and Discussion.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access. By joining our free community you will have access to reading the latest in Industry News, Read and learn from the experts, Upload your own demolition photos to your photo album, read and learn from the experts, and many other special features.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.


Go Back   Demolitionforum.com Forums > DEMOLITION TOPICS > Industry News

Industry News Updated Every Weekday! Read and share the latest in demolition news from around the world. Where you can read industry press releases or add your own.


Why not Register? or Log in to remove these ads
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2006, 07:51 AM
James's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Kent, WA.
Posts: 4,246
Send a message via AIM to James Send a message via MSN to James
Default Demolition issues add up to a mess

Greensburg, PA will be shelling out $100,000 after being ordered to do so by two state agencies over problems with city demolition projects.

The city will have to pay $80,000 more to have asbestos removed from buildings under demolition for parking areas. The city also is responsible for paying nearly $20,000 to Laudadio Excavation and Demolition for problems associated with last year's demolition of the fire-damaged apartment building at 303 E. Pittsburgh St.

Both matters were discussed after the city council meeting Monday.

The issue involving the parking areas arose after a state Department of Environmental Protection review of about 25 properties found more asbestos than did a review done for the city by a consultant, KCI Technologies Inc., of Hunt Valley, Md., Greensburg officials said.

"We have concerns about it," Mayor Karl Eisaman said of KCI's review, declining further comment.

Solicitor Tim McCormick said the city's options are being reviewed. He would not elaborate on what action the city might take.

"I would say the book is not closed on this," McCormick said.

In a report, KCI said three of approximately 25 properties bought by the city for the three parking areas had asbestos that required special care with removal, City Administrator Sue Trout said.

The cost to remove asbestos from those properties was included in the $1.34 million agreement reached with Ligonier Construction Co. to do the demolition and lot-paving work, she said.

The state environmental agency then inspected the buildings.
City officials said they were uncertain what triggered the agency's review.
No representative for KCI or the Department of Environmental Protection could be reached for comment last night.

The actual asbestos removal is being done by a subcontractor hired by Ligonier Construction.

City officials said the $80,000 will come from a $4 million loan the city took out to create the parking areas.

One of the parking areas is between West Otterman and West Pittsburgh streets, near the Greater Greensburg Sewage Authority Building. A second lot will be developed off Harrison Avenue and Seton Hill Drive, behind the Verizon office.

The third is located near St. Clair Park.

The demolition work is continuing.

In the other matter, the city will be paying $19,019.31 to Laudadio in wages and taxes not paid under prevailing wage requirements -- a minimum wage that must be paid when work costs more than $25,000 and public funds are used.

McCormick said he and city officials believed prevailing wage requirements
didn't apply because last year's demolition of the East Pittsburgh Street building was being done under emergency status.

The state Department of Labor and Industry determined otherwise and ordered the city to pay the extra money for the contractor to forward to workers.

Under the law, Greensburg had the duty to make sure prevailing wages were being paid, McCormick said.

A complaint filed with the state agency resulted in the state review, city officials said.

The original agreement with Laudadio was for $54,000.

The misunderstanding about the effect of the city's emergency declaration notwithstanding, McCormick said, the city would have had to pay the money originally.
__________________
Still just visiting? Come say Hello!
We have some open advertising spots available
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Why not Register? or Log in to remove these ads
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


Forum Sponsors



Partners
Dexpan Silent Demo
Diamond Tools SuperCenter
High Reach Demo
Scrap Metal Prices
EnviroBidNet
Heavy Equipment Forums
Lawn Cafe
Phillyblast
Excavator Trader
Home Theater Forum

Advertising Partner


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© 2005-2008 DemolitionForum - All Rights Reserved